A Snowball’s Chance in Iowa
Every election year, as caucus day approaches, the focus on Iowa intensifies. Eyes around the nation pop at every blip in the poll numbers as analysts vie to be the first to declare the rise or fall of each candidate. Everyone is now gaga over Newt Gingrich, who has an apparent double-digit lead in the polls. Nate Silver at The New York Times has posted an analysis of how often Iowa polling predicts a caucus victory, but I’m not so sure that Gingrich’s lead will hold through January 3rd. As a resident of Iowa, I don’t think Gingrich has done enough to motivate voters to go to the caucuses for him.
Gingrich has barely visited the state beyond the almost mandatory debates and forums that bring all of the candidates to the corn fields. I haven’t seen any Gingrich ads yet. I haven’t gotten any phone calls or mailers from his campaign. I’m not even sure he has an Iowa office, and certainly not here in one of the most politically active counties in the state.
So, who will win in Iowa? Let’s break these campaign activities down to see where we stand:
Advertising
The undisputed king of advertising this fall has been Rick Perry. His campaign has flooded the Iowa airwaves on radio and TV with a smug Texas accent, and the “Make Us Great Again” PAC has been running nearly nonstop advertising in support of Perry’s campaign. Second place in the advertising blitz goes to Ron Paul, with Mitt Romney a narrow third. I have seen a couple of Michele Bachmann ads, but no ads from Rick Santorum. According to NPR, Newt Gingrich has begun running ads in Iowa, but I have yet to see even one (and I’ve got the TV on most of the day). I’ve heard more about Newt Gingrich from Ron Paul’s advertising than I’ve heard from the Newt himself. I’ve even seen more Herman Cain ads since he withdrew from the campaign than I’ve seen of Newt Gingrich.
It may be obvious, but it should be noted that advertising alone won’t win the hearts and minds of Iowans, as I’m sure Rick Perry will discover. However, if a candidate doesn’t advertise, then one must ask how the campaign plans to motivate voters. Newt Gingrich hasn’t been running ads, so if he’s going to win Iowa, then we should expect to see accelerated voter outreach in some other form.
| Win | Place | Show |
![]() Rick Perry |
![]() Ron Paul |
![]() Mitt Romney |
Phone Outreach
Without visiting each voter’s home, phone calls are the most direct way that candidates have of reaching out to potential supporters. For a price, a candidate could use the phone to distribute campaign information to every registered voter in the state. Campaigns can organize phone-based fundraisers, recruit volunteers, test campaign talking points, and hold statewide “town hall” calls to engage the voting public. A well-run phone campaign can help overcome an organizational shortfall by connecting with voters on a seemingly personal level. When we look at phone outreach in Iowa this fall, each candidate’s approach reveals a different level of sophistication.
Traditional politician, Mitt Romney, is the master of the robocall and the virtual town hall. Two or three times a week, I get calls from the Romney campaign either announcing another endorsement and asking for my support or inviting me to participate in a virtual town hall meeting where I can ask Romney questions. Even if my question doesn’t make it past the filters during the town hall segment, I can leave a message and get a return response from Romney later. Some voters might get annoyed by the Romney campaign’s persistence, but I think it makes most voters feel valued to have a candidate trying so hard to get their attention.
Ron Paul has also used phone outreach this fall, but with a more personal approach. I get direct calls from Ron Paul volunteers every few days asking if I want to get involved in making a difference in Washington. These volunteers will engage me in informative policy discussions and direct attempts to persuade me to support their chosen candidate. While the Paul campaign’s direct calls won’t have the universal contact of Romney’s robocalls, this more personal approach is likely to have greater per-call persuasive impact.
I’ve also gotten the occasional call from the Santorum and Bachmann campaigns, but not as much as from Romney and Paul, probably because I live in the “liberal” corner of the state and am not readily identifiable as being in the Evangelical or Tea Party demographic. I take the fact that I’ve gotten calls at all as indicative that these two candidates are actively reaching out to voters, just perhaps not so much in my region.
Notably missing from the phone blitz are Rick Perry and Newt Gingrich. Given Rick Perry’s advertising bonanza, I’m a little surprised that he’s not also using robocalls. Considering the political experience of both Perry and Gingrich, their neglect of the phone line suggests that they aren’t really serious about reaching voters here in Iowa, and the conversations that I’ve had with local voters tend to support that impression.
| Win | Place | Show |
![]() Mitt Romney |
![]() Ron Paul |
![]() Michele Bachmann |
Mail Campaigns
Another traditional way to reach voters is via the mail. Unsurprisingly, my mailbox is overflowing with Ron Paul mailers, plus a few Romney and Bachmann brochures crammed in the corners. Dr. Paul regularly solicits donations and distributes information about campaign events. His campaign sends single-issue brochures highlighting specific planks on the Ron Paul platform, laying out the case for why we need change in Washington. Romney and Bachmann’s brochures are typically the traditional candidate placards covered with talking points and directing interested voters to the candidates’ websites. Not particularly engaging or inspirational, but at least they’re making the effort.
Since September, I haven’t gotten anything in the mail from Perry, Santorum, or Gingrich. In lieu of mail campaigns, Perry seems satisfied to focus on television advertising, and Santorum has concentrated on a door-to-door tour of all 99 counties. What has Newt done?
| Win | Place | Show |
![]() Ron Paul |
![]() Mitt Romney |
![]() Michele Bachmann |
Online Presence
All of the candidates have stepped up their online outreach in comparison to prior years, however Ron Paul’s campaign has most thoroughly embraced the Obama For America model. Ron Paul has been copying many of the strategies that made Obama’s online campaign so successful in 2008: email outreach, online meet-ups, fundraising “bombs” and other opportunities for voters to feel involved and connected to the Libertarian movement. Honestly, no other Republican comes close to Ron Paul’s online organization, which is why he’s dominating in the youth demographic.
| Win | Place | Show |
![]() Ron Paul |
![]() |
![]() |
No one else makes it out of the starting gate.
Direct Voter Contact
Iowans notoriously like to meet a candidate face to face before giving their support. Rarely does a candidate do well here without slogging through corn fields and pig farms on the way to rallies at factories and Sunday socials. We want town halls where the candidate answers direct questions with conviction, pragmatism, and sincerity. In Iowa, voters have to show up at caucuses and stand before neighbors and peers with their endorsement, so if the candidate can’t handle the direct scrutiny of ordinary Iowans, then it’s unlikely those Iowans will stand up for them either.
This year, the one candidate who has most completely embraced the door-to-door approach is Rick Santorum. He has held multiple events in all 99 counties in the state, holding more campaign events and rallies than the next two candidates combined. He boldly meets face-to-face with voters and isn’t afraid to field ad-hoc, unscripted questions. In stereotypical Iowa fashion, I’ve shaken hands with him and even got to ask a question or two. If we relied exclusively on retail campaigning, he would be winning, because he’s articulate, knowledgeable and personable when talking with voters in small groups. He’s hampered by his retro-90s reliance on “family values” and his whiny debate style.
Bachmann has also blanketed the state with campaign events, but not quite with the dedication of Santorum. She’s been through town more than once, and I’ve bumped into her campaign organizers at hotels and other gathering places. I missed her most recent rally here in town, but I understand she drew a decent-sized crowd. According to her campaign, she’s got more supporters signed up than Huckabee had when he won the state, but it remains to be seen whether those voters will actually show up at the caucuses. Blow-out wins in the western part of the state could be canceled by poor showings in the east.
The other candidate who has traversed Iowa this season is Ron Paul. He’s held fewer rallies than Bachmann, but with consistently larger draws. I’ve personally heard Ron Paul addressing a crowd of over two thousand supporters (in a town of less than 70,000…70% of whom are Democrats). He uses his online outreach to ensure turnout of enthusiastic, young voters who lend energy to a candidate who’s even older than McCain.
Prior to Thanksgiving, Romney hadn’t been here much, but he has since begun holding local town halls and other rallies. He has concentrated his appearances in the northeast and central parts of the state, where he’s more likely to find establishment conservatives rather than evangelical or movement conservatives. While candidates like Santorum and Bachmann go it alone, Romney also has surrogates such as New Jersey Governor Chris Christie and Senator John Thune (R-SD) holding meet-n-greet sessions with voters across the state. Those surrogate meet-ups don’t often appear on the candidate calendars, but they do help voters feel connected to the campaign.
Not so much from anyone else. You can check Politico’s Candidate Tracker to see what I mean. As an example of how far behind Gingrich is, his big event last week was the opening of his Iowa campaign office on Saturday…
| Win | Place | Show |
![]() Rick Santorum |
![]() Michele Bachmann |
![]() Ron Paul |
Mitt Romney takes fourth in the Superfecta.
Volunteers & Activism
This is the area where a lack of action from Romney is most troubling for the inevitability campaign. If activism alone decided the winner, then Ron Paul will be the Iowa pick. Bachmann’s campaign is the next most active, with gatherings and meet-ups across the state. Romney has structure in place, but little actual activity going on, as his campaign seems to rely on a more top-down approach. No one else’s campaign generates enough heat to move the thermometer above zero.
| Win | Place | Show |
![]() Ron Paul |
![]() Michele Bachmann |
![]() Mitt Romney |
Summary
If you told me that Ron Paul was leading the Iowa polls, I would give him good odds of winning the caucuses, because he’s got the most complete campaign presence in terms of advertising, mailings, phone contact, rallies, online presence, and volunteer activism. In getting voters to show up on a cold day in January, motivation and organization often matter more than numbers.
Although Mitt Romney has been playing it low-key in Iowa, his campaign is the next most organized after Ron Paul’s. He hasn’t held nearly as many campaign stops as Santorum or Bachmann, but he’s got the established infrastructure and has made active use of the available technology to reach voters. His support isn’t as enthusiastic, but it’s more grounded with the folks who never miss a vote. I wouldn’t count Romney out in Iowa, no matter how he looked in the polls. Furthermore, former Cain supporters who want a candidate with solid business acumen will probably end up with Romney by default.
Newt Gingrich is the nominal leader in the current Iowa polls, but I don’t see any depth of traction. He has made so little effort to reach voters in the state, that I have a very hard time imagining that his polling lead will translate to a caucus victory. You need some chains on those tires to reach the polls on January 3rd.
Given their ground games, if you told me that Michele Bachmann or Rick Santorum was the favorite in Iowa, I would be more inclined to believe that either of them had a chance to win than Newt Gingrich.
Rick Perry has tried to use advertising to overcome his obvious flaws in other areas, but Iowans don’t like to buy without a test-drive. If he were the only evangelical candidate on the slate, I’d give him a chance regardless, but Christian-centric voters have other options in Bachmann or Santorum.
Oh, and Jon who? Huntsman’s not even trying.
Related articles
- The Official Iowa Caucus Website (iowacaucus.com)
- Des Moines Register Iowa Caucus site (desmoinesregister.com)
- Gingrich Emerges as Clear Front Runner in Iowa (washingtonpost.com)
- Iowa Republican Presidential Primary Polls (realclearpolitics.com)
- How Safe is Gingrich’s Lead in Iowa (fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com)
- Politico’s Iowa Caucus site (politico.com)
- The 2012 Speculatron Weekly Roundup For December 9, 2011 (huffingtonpost.com)
- Newt Changes Course, Hitting Back At GOP Rival (huffingtonpost.com)
- Ron Paul Has Real Chance of Becoming GOP Nominee (prnewswire.com)
- Chris Weigant: Two Ron Paul Winning Scenarios (huffingtonpost.com)
- Gingrich Is a ‘Human Hand Grenade’ (newser.com)
- Romney Launches All-Out Attack on Newt (newser.com)
- This New Poll Should Have Mitt Romney VERY Worried About The Newt Gingrich Boom (businessinsider.com)
- Newt Gingrich Threat To Mitt Romney Rises After Iowa Debate (huffingtonpost.com)
- Newt: ‘I’ve Made Mistakes’ (huffingtonpost.com)
- Gingrich Targeted At Lively GOP Debate (huffingtonpost.com)
- Newt Comes To Debate With Front-Runner Status, But Can He Keep His Cool? (huffingtonpost.com)
- Gingrich Takes Fire At Iowa Debate, Romney Misfires (outsidethebeltway.com)
- Perry: I Was ‘Taken Aback’ by $10K Bet (newser.com)
- Who will win Mitt Romney’s $10,000 wager? Just maybe, Ron Paul | Ana Marie Cox (guardian.co.uk)
- Iowa Debate: Winners and Losers (worldviewtonight.wordpress.com)
- GOP presidential debate in Iowa: Gingrich versus Romney — live (guardian.co.uk)
- Iowa Debate: Winners and Losers — CBS News (cbsnews.com)













There are actually two caucus polls on January 3.
There’s the actual poll, which you discuss here.
Then there’s the expectations game, which is the part that I get upset about. Various pundits and commentators set up straw men, then set them on fire the day after. The day after the Iowa caucuses, anytime someone says, “exceed(s/ed) expectations” or “disappointed” I throw up in my mouth just a little.