The 2012 Republican Primary Field: January 5, 2012

From June to December, we gave you a rundown of the Republican field for the 2012 Presidential nomination. These “Stampeding Elephant” features (see image at left) used to come about mid-month. For the next few weeks, or at least until the nominee becomes clear, we plan to update these weekly on Thursdays (weakly stampeding elephants?), as the results from Saturday and Tuesday votes come in and are digested by the punditry.
The Iowa Caucuses didn’t change things much in terms of placement of Republican contenders, though it did whittle the number down by one. Former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney was the big beneficiary on Intrade. There is now a 75 point gap between Romney, with an 81 percent chance of winning the nomination, and second-place former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, at six percent.
We started the monthly recaps in June with 11 candidates and potential candidates judged by Intrade investors to have better than a one percent chance of securing the Republican nomination. Nine candidates met the one-percent threshold in July and August. In September, the number of maybe-viable candidates dropped to six. October’s rundown had seven candidates at greater than one percent on Intrade. In November, there were still seven candidates, with Mitt Romney and Newt Gingrich in the first and second positions, Texas Governor Rick Perry fading fast in third, and Representative Ron Paul (R-Lake Jackson, TX) and Jon Huntsman tied for fourth. Herman Cain was still in the race last month, but dropping fast in sixth place, and Representative Michele Bachmann (R-Stillwater, MN) in seventh.
At the time of our last rundown, 21 days ago in mid-December, the “Not Romney” was Gingrich, but his “Not Romney” surge lasted no longer than a month. Former Senator Rick Santorum had the good sense to mount a “Not Romney” surge in late December, just in time for the Iowa Caucuses. That brought him into a tie with Romney (who presumably is unable to mount a “Not Romney” surge). At last report, Romney led by eight votes, 30,015 to 30,007, so I’m comfortable calling that a tie because it’s a margin of 0.0066%, well within the margin of error of any voting system with over 100,000 votes cast.
This close to the caucus, Real Clear Politics aggregated poll averages aren’t going to help us much. RCP is currently aggregating polls from mid-December to January 3, so there hasn’t been time for the aggregated polls to react to the news of the Santorum Surprise. However, Intrade investor/bettors have had time to digest and act on the Iowa news, so let’s once again focus on those numbers.
I’ve listed the potential Republican candidates below, in order of their Intrade percentages, from highest to lowest. In each case, the polling numbers are given in parentheses after the candidate’s name, rounded to the nearest whole number, followed by the change from last month:
RCP = the most recent (though outdated) available Real Clear Politics aggregated polling data.
In = Intrade January 4.
I compiled rank-order listings from the seven monthly surveys I’ve done plus this one.
| Candidate | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | Jan 5 |
| Romney | 1 | 1 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
| Gingrich | 8 | 9 |
none |
none |
8 |
4 (tie) |
2 |
2 |
2 |
| Santorum | none | none | none | none | none | none | none | none | 3 (tie) |
| Huntsman | 4 | 3 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
4 (tie) |
4 (tie) |
4 |
3 (tie) |
| Paul | 9 | 10 |
7 |
7 |
6 |
4 (tie) |
4 (tie) |
3 |
5 |
| Perry | none | 4 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
6 |
6 |
As a point of reference: on January 4, 2008, in RCP polling, New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani (20 percent) was in first place, and Senator John McCain (R-AZ) and Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee were tied for second (17 percent). Mitt Romney was in fourth (15 percent), followed by Senator Fred Thompson (R-TN) in fifth (11 percent).
1.
Former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney (RCP 26% +3; In 81% +33)
As the front runner, Romney didn’t change places with anyone as a result of the Iowa caucus, but he did have a big surge in his numbers. Intrade investors are now quite confident that Romney will be the nominee. Note the huge gap that has now opened up between Romney and Gingrich. From the graph, we can see that Romney has been on a tortoise-like climb since our last rundown. His climb, combined with Gingrich’s dead tortoise-like drop, has opened up a lot of space between them.
2.
Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich (RCP 25% –9; In 6% –24%)
Romney’s rise was mirrored by a corresponding Gingrich fall. Gingrich’s drop was faster, and mostly occurred during the week between December 15 and 19. Since then, he’s been bumping along the bottom, but his bottom is good enough for second place.
3 (tie).
Former Senator Rick Santorum (RCP 5%; In 4% +3)
Santorum came out of nowhere with spectacular organization. If he gets the nod from the rumored Über-conservative summit in Brenham, Texas this weekend, then you can expect to see his Intrade numbers rise even further. If Gingrich is the summit’s choice, then he should rise. Stay tuned for next week’s update, after the New Hampshire primary.
3 (tie).
Former Utah Governor, former Obama Administration Ambassador to China, Jon Huntsman (RCP 2% –1; In 4% –1)
Huntsman shares certain characteristics with Romney (Mormon, thought to be moderate-to-liberal, pragmatist, rich as Croesus), so he probably will never catch on as a Not Romney. It’s a shame, because someone has to take the crown if/when Santorum stumbles. He has faltered on Intrade, but others have done worse, so in our standings, he “rises” into a virtual tie with Santorum (4.1% vs 4.0% at this writing).
5.
Representative Ron Paul (R-Lake Jackson, TX) (RCP 13% +3; In 3% –5)
Ron Paul just can’t catch a break; a strong third-place showing at the Iowa Caucuses was not enough to convince Intrade investors of his viability as a candidate. He fell hard after Iowa, as can be seen from the graph at right. He is the biggest loser from the Iowa Caucuses.
6.
Texas Governor Rick Perry (RCP 6% –1; In 2% –1)
∞.
Representative Michele Bachmann (R-Stillwater, MN)
Bachmann announced the suspension of her campaign Wednesday. Last month, she was in fifth place in our standings.









Mono, interesting as always. You know we often talk about those people that used to be the heart and soul of the Republican party and how disenfranchised they must now feel. Can you imagine how the loyal Paulites must feel? Some of them are wingnuts but there are any number of them that are quite clear eyed and serious about their support of the broader Paul program. For them there really is no viable home that realistically puts forth a candidate that at the present time has a snowballs chance in hell of getting any where near the White House. But I will give them credit for keeping on keeping on. While Paul numbers are not huge it still amounts to a crap load of people that can but best hope to push the narrative even marginally in a certain direction.
I had the opportunity yesterday to kick back for a while over a couple of Sam Adams with some locals and of course the talk turned to politics. This crowd is of the more traditional Republican party. And oh my gosh are they angry. These are actual business people, you know hire people, make stuff, actually build things, old line Republicans. They were talking roads and rails, ports and airports, electricity and energy costs, foreign competition, education and those gawd awful banks. To say these people are fiscally conservative would be an understatement but they are not regressively or reactionary in that conservatism. These people are progressive. They are all about making money the real old fashioned way, build some thing, produce some thing and sell it and they to a man.……no to a man and two women would discard the entire Republican field and start over.
I mentioned the Texas confab.……that went over like a fart in a spacesuit. They don’t want any more bible thumper come politicans any where near the process. They want business people with some sense of history. I of course mentioned Romney.….…they don’t consider him any more a business man than the man in the moon, to them he is just another pretty boy bank thug that only knows how to wreck business not build business, I almost got Gingrich in on the history but then saw that go to hell as they ripped on him as well. Santorum was dismissed as a false bible thumping asshole that couldn’t organize a circle jerk in a nudist colony (that from one of the women and one of those moments that had several try to exhale beer out their nose).
No Mono I guess I will stick with my previous thoughts on this and conclude that Julius Caesar could have been describing the Republican party in his beginning of his book on the Gaelic wars. Funny thing is while some of this crowd will probably vote for what ever ends up on the ballot with an R after their name I would venture a guess that maybe half of last evenings get together well may not and several flat out said they would vote for the president because they felt that it would be better for them and their business. Didn’t see that coming and they didn’t catch much flack from the others.
Just some observations worth about nothing most likely but I found it interesting.