The 2012 Republican Primary Field: March 1, 2012

Sixes
The standings haven’t changed much from last week’s rundown, but there have been some subtle changes in the fortunes of each of the potential Republican candidates. Former Massachusetts Governor Willard “Mitt” Romney had a pretty good Tuesday night, taking all the delegates in Arizona and half of them in Michigan. It’s looking more and more like a two-man race going into Super Tuesday, which is a mere five days away.
The clear favorite amongst the NotRomneys is former Senator Rick Santorum (R-PA).
Among the NotNotRomneys, there have been few changes. New Jersey Governor Chris Christie has dropped below the one percent minimum required to be listed in our countdown, as the possibility of a brokered convention is felt by Intraders to be more remote. Former Florida Governor John Ellis “Jeb” Bush is still the favored NotNotRomney.
It’s time to look at the delegate math, in preparation for Super Tuesday (March 6). A majority of Republican delegates is 1,144. Romney has 149, Santorum 86, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich 29 (almost all from South Carolina, where he gained 23) and Representative Ron Paul (R-Lake Jackson, TX) 18. About a quarter of the delegates will be assigned on March 3 (Washington State) or March 6 (Super Tuesday). Using the delegate counts from The New York Times, I’ve developed the graph at right. Each step represents one of the ten delegate-bearing primaries or caucuses held so far.
Romney’s biggest step (and therefore biggest victory so far) was the 50 delegates he gained in the January 31 Florida primary, representing about a third of his total delegates so far. Absent that one major victory, Romney and Santorum are pretty close in the delegate count. Santorum and Romney tied the delegate count in Michigan, with 15 each, but of course that’s not the media narrative.
I’ve listed the potential Republican candidates below, in order of their Intrade percentages, from highest to lowest. In each case, the polling numbers are given in parentheses after the candidate’s name, rounded to the nearest whole number, followed by the change from last month:
RCP = the most recent (February 16–28) available Real Clear Politics national aggregated polling data.
In = Intrade February 29.
In the interest of space and clarity, I’ve dropped the May-October monthly standings columns. The horserace standings now start in November, but you can go to the January 5 article to see the entire set going back to May, 2011.
| Candidate | Nov | Dec | Jan 5 | Jan 12 | Jan 19 | Jan 25 | Feb 2 | Feb 9 | Feb 16 | Feb 23 | Mar 1 |
| Romney | 1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
| Santorum | none |
none |
3 (tie) |
4 (tie) |
none |
4 |
4 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
| Gingrich | 2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
| Paul | 4 (tie) |
3 |
5 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
| Bush, J | none |
none |
none |
none |
none |
none |
none |
none |
5 |
5 |
5 |
1.
Former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney (RCP 33% +5; In 82% +7)
Romney looks good in Virginia, if only because Gingrich and Santorum didn’t make the ballot there. Massachusetts and Vermont are pretty sure to go Romney’s way, too.
2.
Former Senator Rick Santorum (R-PA) (RCP 31% –3; In 6% –5)
Santorum did okay in Michigan, and has a chance in Ohio. He will likely pick up delegates in Oklahoma and Tennessee. Alaska, Idaho, North Dakota, and Wyoming (where caucuses run for a week starting on Super Tuesday), states with more of a social conservative bent than a fiscal conservative one, are also likely winners for Santorum. Expect him to have a very good Super Tuesday.
3.
Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich (RCP 15% +1; In 4% –1)
Gingrich didn’t get much traction from the contests in Arizona and Michigan. His campaign just hasn’t had any good news since South Carolina. He needs a strong showing in Tuesday’s contests, and it doesn’t look like that’s going to happen for him; the numbers just aren’t there. He will likely take his home state of Georgia, but that’s about it.
4.
Representative Ron Paul (R-Lake Jackson, TX) (RCP 11% –1; In 3% 0)
Paul will make it to the convention, but he doesn’t look to have much of an impact there. Maybe he can carve his name on a plank in the party platform.
5.
Former Florida Governor Jeb Bush (RCP no data; In 2% –1%)
Jeb Bush is still the rumored favorite of the “brokered convention” crowd.
Related articles
- The 2012 Republican Primary Field: February 23, 2012 (logarchism.com)
- Michigan Surprise: Santorum and Romney Split Delgates (inquisitr.com)
- Romney, Santorum to Split Michigan Delegates (swampland.time.com)
- Romney hangs in, but Super Tuesday could keep rivals alive (macleans.ca)
- A bad night for the GOP frontrunners — Macleans.ca (blog) (macleans.ca)
- Mitt Romney boosted by primary sweep ahead of critical Super Tuesday vote (guardian.co.uk)
- Romney survives Michigan as all eyes turn to Super Tuesday — CNN (edition.cnn.com)

This entry was posted by Monotreme on March 1, 2012 at 3:00 am, and is filed under Republican 2012 Presidential Nomination. Follow any responses to this post through RSS 2.0.You can leave a response or trackback from your own site.
-
#2 written by WA7th 1 year ago
Washington has 43 delegates, but the March 3 caucus and straw poll does not allocate the delegates to a candidate until the June 2 state convention. The closer the results of the straw poll, the higher the margin of error in trying to project a winner this Saturday. Delegates chosen at the precinct level will go to county conventions, which will be used to choose delegates for the state convention. A delegate elected to the next level can vote for anyone they want once they get there, as there is no loyalty requirement. In past years, after Pat Robertson won the state caucus in ’88, a separate primary assigned half the delegates, but the primary fell victim to state budget cuts last year.
-
WA7th,
Yes, Washington has a nonbinding caucus. In that regard, it’s little different from Iowa. The reason it matters in this context is it’s the one narrative that will occur between now and Super Tuesday, which means it will have an impact on the momentum story.The closer the results of the straw poll, the higher the margin of error in trying to project a winner this Saturday.
The delegate winner, anyway. But, really, in the press nobody has cared that much about the true delegate count. Don’t get me wrong, it will matter a great deal in Florida this summer, but it’s just not going to matter going into Super Tuesday.
In past years, after Pat Robertson won the state caucus in ’88, a separate primary assigned half the delegates, but the primary fell victim to state budget cuts last year.
At least Republicans made use of the primary. For a number of years, Democrats had, as a matter of policy, a primary election that behaved exactly like the one this year in Missouri (which was more of an accident). Good thing they eliminated that beauty contest election several years ago.
-
Breitbart is pretty much a poster child for the “type A hostile” personality. I wouldn’t be surprised if the autopsy reveals a significant level of heart disease — or perhaps a burst aneurysm.
A good lesson for us all. Mellow out, people.
-
#5 written by dawolf 1 year ago
OK, so I was looking at Super Tuesday. I’m not sure which are winner takes all/proportional etc. But assuming Santorum can avoid a load more foot in mouth comments, and the state of play is roughly as now, then the results are likely to be something along the lines of:
Georgia (76) — Gingrich (big favourite)
Ohio (63) — Santorum (could go Romney)
Tennessee (55) — Santorum (big favourite)
Virginia (46) — Romney (only Romney & Paul on ballot)
Oklahoma (40) — Santorum (big favourite)
Massachusetts (38) — Romney (big favourite)
Idaho (32) — Santorum I reckon. Unsure though
North Dakota (28) — Santorum I reckon. Unsure though.
Alaska (24) — Santorum I reckon
Vermont (17) — Romney (big favourite).
If only Gingrich had got on the Virginia ballot! Gutted. As it is, I see this as a big “Santorum wins!” day, unless some changes happen. And of far more importance than the Michigan result…
-
dawolf,
Your views on the states line up with mine (other than Idaho, which isn’t a “reckon” in my book…I’m sure they love Santorum there).All of the states next Tuesday are proportional in one way or another. Some go by Congressional district, where it’s winner-take-all within the district. Some go proportional by district, some go proportional by statewide margin. And they’re typically a mix of all of that (e.g., within a single state, one bucket is statewide proportional, while another bucket is winner-take-all by district).
I expect Gingrich to go all out for Tennessee, which is his most likely pickup other than Georgia. If he can’t win Tennessee, his campaign is essentially over.
-
-
#9 written by GROG 1 year ago
Max,
Breitbart has died. OMG! The guy was only 43.
In the spirit of Jean and Filistro and how they like to quote commenters from Free Republic and Red State because they think that is somehow representative of conservatives, here are a couple gems from Slate.com:
Steven Schwartz
Well apparently, his God didn’t love him either, too bad it didn’t happen sooner.
Tom Pryor
As soon as I saw the dude screaming incoherently at the OWS protesters during CPAC, with that classic d-bag stubble beard, I knew he was coked to the gills. Dude was on some Tony Montana ish. And now he’s dead. Good riddance.There were more, but Slate is trying to delete comments as quick as they’re being posted.
-
#10 written by rgbact 1 year ago
-
#11 written by Max aka Birdpilot 1 year ago
GROG and rgbact,
And they are assholes with no respect. And honestly, shame on the two of you for playing directly into their game! Did either I or Mono even HINT at our and Breitbart’s differences in ideology in our mention of him? And rgbact, your “opinion” on “some lefties” is crude and condemns YOU as badly as the assholes you opine on.Take a look at the comments in College Football Talk deriding the President and the reporter for even asking him about his opinion on NCAA football playoffs. They are assholes as well. As though EVERY president for the best part a century hasn’t hosted national championship teams at the White House. Even Nixon stepped into the fray back in ’68 over the real national champion between Texas and Penn State! Damn, EVERYBODY has opinions on sports.
Hell, I DETESTED Lee Atwater’s methods. He’s, by far, the primary reason I did NOT join the Bush 41 advance team and one of the big reasons I bailed on the GOP a quarter century ago. But I would never highlight assholes’ criticism at the time of his illness and death. I’d much rather remember his blues guitar.
One thing Andrew and Lee and I would ALWAYS agree on, regardless the differences in ideology and political persuasion. It’s that we are ALL proud Americans and proud to live in an America where we CAN fight tooth and nail over our differences and, every couple of years, We the People, not some Putin, or Supreme Leader, or ayatollah, decide how this great country is going to be run the next few years, and we can go back to our bickering.
Lots of times it’s best to leave the politics outside and respect people and their opinions beyond that realm and find those thing in common instead of seeking things that divide.
This is one of them.
-
#12 written by GROG 1 year ago
Max,
Did either I or Mono even HINT at our and Breitbart’s differences in ideology in our mention of him?
No, you both are much too classy to do that.
But, thanks for illustrating how ridiculous it is to take comments from a handful of individuals and try to sell them as being representative of an entire mass of people. (ie, one or two racists at an entire Tea Party rally, or one or two dumb commenters on a conservative blog) -
#13 written by Armchair Warlord 1 year ago
-
#14 written by Jean 1 year ago
GROG and rgbact,
Apparently it’s all Obama’s fault.
http://www.buzzfeed.com/mjs538/people-who-think-president-obama-killed-andrew-bre
-
#15 written by Max aka Birdpilot 1 year ago
GROG,
But, thanks for illustrating how ridiculous it is to take comments from a handful of individuals and try to sell them as being representative of an entire mass of people. (ie, one or two racists at an entire Tea Party rally, or one or two dumb commenters on a conservative blog)
No, that is NOT what I illustrated. I was illustrating that there are LOTS of assholes of all stripes, not just one or two in a crowd by which one may attempt to judge the entire crowd. And your continuing attempts to place ideological spin on the back of a husband and father who died and left a gaping hole in the lives of those children and that wife is a supreme sign of disrespect and that lack is making me reassess how I may deal with you going forward.
You owe his family an apology.
-
grog
Breitbart’s tweets re: death of Ted Kennedy:
a big ass motherf@#$er ~ duplicitous bastard ~ pile of human excrement
Breitbart’s cause of death: intense hatred of himself, Obama, liberals, etc.
>
grog drew first blood in this thread so I’ll let him have the last word …
-
The Republican Party has re-energized the women’s rights movement in America. They’ve re-energized unions. Now, they’re trying to let employers decide IN DETAIL what health care you can have.
The Democratic Party (and, by coincidence, seven Republican senators who are running for reëlection) defeated the Blunt Amendment. Take note of the horrors that await America if Republicans win control of both Houses and the Presidency. The attempts to establish a theocratic plutocracy of lords and serfs is in full force.
Santorum and Gingrich are leading the charge. Romney is playing a “Me, too!” game, but he’s so incredibly clueless that no one believes him.
-
-
#19 written by Max aka Birdpilot 1 year ago
-
Max, I don’t see a problem with recognizing a man’s body of work as a tribute to his life. I pass no judgement, and offer no opinion. May a man be known by his works and his words; such requires no elaboration or comment by any others. I also feel anyone deserves the same level of respect he or she has shown to others.
On the other hand, the grieving family and friends deserve our support for the loss of a loved one. My heart goes out to them. (I would have said the same thing yesterday.)
-
#21 written by rgbact 1 year ago
The Democratic Party (and, by coincidence, seven Republican senators who are running for reëlection) defeated the Blunt Amendment.
I’m confused. I show that Olympia Snowe was the only Repub voting against, and she’s not running (else she might’ve voted differently). And 3 Democrats voted for it, 2 are up in 2012. -
rgbact,
Thank you for correcting me. The seven Republican Senators I was thinking of did, in fact, vote in favor of the Blunt Amendment, despite having to run for reëlection. The fear of a nutcase right-winger in a primary challenge must have been too much for them. As with the Presidential candidates, they’re going to have to walk back these dangerously extreme positions in the general campaign.
-
#24 written by rgbact 1 year ago
-
#25 written by Max aka Birdpilot 1 year ago
dc,
anyone deserves the same level of respect he or she has shown to others.
I do not have to stoop to another’s level the day they die. Funerals are not for the dead, they are to ease their passing for those who loved them.
For the living, we can go hammer and tong. Trade like for like. Ask several here. But should one of my worst opponents suddenly drop dead, that’s past.
-
-
#27 written by Max aka Birdpilot 1 year ago
dc,
Actually, I’m not! I’m a mean old bastard. I’ll crush you with all my power, should you challenge me, and with no remorse. Y’all have seen me in action here. Quick in anger.
But also quick to forgive. Try never to hold a grudge. Why waste time with a grudge against the dead, anyway? They can’t respond and you really have better things to do! -
#28 written by WA7th 1 year ago
-
Interesting dichotomy given Max’s political blog history that he would “attempt” to give lessons re: blog etiquette!
Indeed, like shilohbuster getting self-righteous about personal attacks.
FWIW, at the conservative blog I frequent, “they” are treating Breitbart’s passing like a death in the family …
Again, the yin and yang of political blogs.
-
WA7th,
Andrew Breitbart was the guy who did the fake video of people at the ACORN offices. He had at one point been heavily involved with the Huffington Post, and then with the Drudge Report. After that, he parted ways with Drudge for reasons that differ, depending on whom you ask. In any case, he went on his own, and that’s when he did the ACORN thing. -
#31 written by Rose 1 year ago
-
-
#33 written by curious jane 1 year ago
Brietbart was the guy who phonied up the 1970’s version of a pimp and his “ladies” setting up a clientel chain in an ACORN office. It basically destoyed ACORN, obviously the people who believed it were rural whites. This among other radical efforts to fake facts to adapt to his own views made him quite a character. I didn’t like or respect his methods and views but the loss of a son, spouse, brother, or father at the age of 43 is heartbreaking for the family.
The Women’s Movement activated bigger and stronger than they have in decades. For those of you totally against abortion, the right is just that. I had a friend, happily married with two children. She almost died having those two children. The doctor told her she could not survive another pregnancy. Her church was against contraception and abortion. Should she have ignored her doctor or Church? The men mandating these policies are on dangerous grounds. How dare men assume a majority of women have tubes tied or abortions on a whim. Where are there jobs ideas other than cutting taxes? By the way authorization on the southern pipeline is beginning. I think I heard that on NPR, maybe I misheard. President Obama is not against drilling and the pipeline. The drilling moratorium in the Gulf is because of the disasterous event (the resulting damage is still unknown). -
#34 written by Max aka Birdpilot 1 year ago
shiloh,
Oh, hell no!
Attack me personally all you wish. If what you say is accurate, I’ll even agree.
But you damn well better keep it honest. And you should have read my comment #27 by now, so I’m the first to admit that I will fight as dirty, maybe dirtier, than my opponent. So I’d hope you could point out that “self-righteousness”. But if you WANT to make it personal, bring it on, lad. Unlike some of our friends here, I won’t get my feelings all hurt and pretend you don’t exist. “Fustest, with the mostest“
And you are welcome to point out any dichotomy. I don’t believe you will find me anywhere or at anytime, speaking ill of the recently deceased no matter how much I may have disagreed in life with them. But if YOU wish to kick a man around, dead and defenseless, then I WILL consider you an asshole. Worse, an asshole with no guts!
Pick on someone capable of defending themselves! Perhaps you enjoy kicking the ass of a stone cold drunk or 8 year old kids. I don’t. And I will come to their aid if I see a grown man doing so. If that’s you, so be it.And at the end of it all, I’ll STILL buy you a beer if you make it down here to Gruene.
-
#36 written by Max aka Birdpilot 1 year ago
-
#37 written by Mule Rider 1 year ago
-
#38 written by Max aka Birdpilot 1 year ago
shiloh,
That’s cool. I don’t mind at all being known for turning a hard core foe into a friend with whom I can still strongly and passionately disagree.
Who knows, someday that former foe may be in a position to help me in a time of need.“Jamis was a friend. He taught me …” Paul Atreides at the funeral service of the man he had just killed in duel.
-
shilohbuster, (in his best Rodney King voice) …
People, I just want to say, you know, can we all get along? Can we get along? Can we stop making it, making it horrible for the older people and the kids?…It’s just not right. It’s not right.
Please, we can get along here. We all can get along. I mean, we’re all stuck here for a while. Let’s try to work it out. Let’s try to beat it. Let’s try to beat it. Let’s try to work it out.
>
And Max, it’s ok to be buddies w/Undeniable lol.
Oh hell, you can be buddies w/Shots and Michael as well.
-
#40 written by Max aka Birdpilot 1 year ago
-
#41 written by Mule Rider 1 year ago
-
#42 written by WA7th 1 year ago
-
#43 written by Max aka Birdpilot 1 year ago
Just watched the last of Lawrence O’Donnell and Toure and Goldie Taylor on Andrew Breitbart, it included the statement made by Shirley Sherrod.
I feel quite vindicated in my stated position today, having listened to people who knew, and fought, him directly.
As was said, “if you call yourself a liberal, then compassion should be your first name.“
If you didn’t see it, try to see if it comes on YouTube. -
Speaking of Last Word and YouTube …
Bob Kerrey ~ last word on ‘Last Word’ last nite.
>
And yes, Shirley Sherrod had amazing grace re: Breitbart …
-
-
-
-
#48 written by Armchair Warlord 1 year ago
-
#50 written by dawolf 1 year ago
Max, whilst I respect your opinion I personally see no moral reason to only speak good of the dead. It is a personal choice, one you have made and which you can be respected for. Personally (and I think it IS a personal decision), I would generally only talk good of the dead in most cases.
But take Thatcher. When she dies I know there are pubs in the north of England that have put aside a bottle of whiskey (or some such) purely to celebrate that day. Because she destroyed millions of lives and hundreds of communities for political gain.…and why would they be hypocritical and mourn the passing of something who did that?
btw, I’ve never heard of Breitbart, so no comment to make on him personally. -
#51 written by Max aka Birdpilot 1 year ago
dawolf,
You are 180 degrees off in the assessment. I have NOT said “only speak good”, but the obverse: Speak no ill. I do NOT say to actively mourn, but only to hold one’s fire.
Several reasons: 1) You’re fighting an opponent who can’t fight back. Most unfair! As I likened it in a earlier comment, it’s tantamount to beating a stone drunk, a 9 year old kid, a 100 year old man. Where is the honor in that? Have you any honor?
2) We’re talking a political opponent in a democracy, someone with whom we disagree ideologically. We aren’t talking about a Stalin or an Idi Amin or Hitler. There are maybe as many out there who disagree with OUR politics, it’s why we vote every few years.
3) Just plain old respect for the living. Would you wish that your wife and young children hear such negativity and nastiness about you whilst you are waiting to be laid to rest, not even in the ground yet? What have THEY done to deserve to be disrespected?
Thatcher created many political enemies. I doubt many Argentines will weep on the news of her death. Labour and Liberal leaders will be more circumspect, I’ll wager you with long odds, though. And those folks of whom you speak are assholes should they celebrate her death. Did they have such negative feeling about her when she defended and recaptured the Falklands?
My heritage is Ulster-Scot, border people (Scot-Irish here in the States), who suffered mightily at the hands of a series of English monarchs and parliaments. Basically ran out of their home and hearth. Twice! Want to discuss the Siege of Derry? How about Edward I and Berwick? Against that background, is it hypocritical for me to ally with St. James Court these days?
There is no hypocrisy in recognizing that things change and that death changes things most of all.
For all, here’s the O’Donnell piece on Breitbart I wrote about last night, you should watch:
http://www.mediaite.com/tv/lawrence-odonnell-goldie-taylor-and-toure-offer-kind-words-for-breitbart-praise-for-shirley-sherrod/ -
#52 written by Max aka Birdpilot 1 year ago
-
#53 written by Max aka Birdpilot 1 year ago
-
#54 written by mclever 1 year ago
I agree with Max here. Not that I’d go out of my way to say glowing things about someone for whom I held no affection, but comments at someone’s passing should be geared towards comfort of those who’ve lost someone dear to them. That, and my sense of fair play prohibits me from attacking someone who cannot fight back.
With regard to the Republican field, I’m still quite convinced that Romney will win, even if he has a rough “Super Tuesday” due to the demographics of the states involved. Super Tuesday isn’t nearly so Super this time, and there’ll be plenty of opportunity for him to pick up delegates in the larger, more populous states that will be demographically more favorable to him. I’m also not surprised that Santorum has emerged as the NotRomney. Having met him last August and seen him campaigning up close, he comes across in person the best of any in the Republican field. People will give their votes to someone they like even if they disagree on a few things over someone who they think is a jerk even if they agree more.
-
btw, I’ve never heard of Breitbart, so no comment to make on him personally.
Nor had I before his Shirley Sherrod muckraking ie muckraking is what made him known er infamous, much like Drudge and Limbaugh. In other words, over-the-top hyperbole, hate and misinformation was his claim to fame! Indeed, this is why conservatives are mourning his death as he was “their” guy!
btw, the # of folk who attend your funeral is directly proportional to how the weather is that day …
Watched a little bit of The Bad and Beautiful a couple days ago and Kirk Douglas, a Hollywood producer, paid several peeps to attend a studio mogul’s funeral.
>
At the conservative blog I frequent, the blog mistress had (5) separate threads re: the death of Breitbart.
-
#56 written by Mainer 1 year ago
Shiloh not sure I would lump folks such as Limbaugh, Drudge or Breitbart into any grouping of muckrakers. Provocateurs maybe but when I think of muckrakers I tend to think of people like Upton Sinclair, Ida Tarbell or a Jacob Riis (still think some of his photo journalism of the time set the standard). The thing they all seemed to have in common was speaking the truth and taking on the powerful to assist the powerless. I have a hard time seeing where Drudge, Limbaugh or Breitbart have ever let the truth get in the way of a preconceived story and assisting the powerless has pretty much compleatly eluded them.
-
#57 written by dawolf 1 year ago
“And those folks of whom you speak are assholes should they celebrate her death. Did they have such negative feeling about her when she defended and recaptured the Falklands?“
Good question, but the answer is that Thatcher was disliked by many before the Falklands, the Falklands happened and she got re-elected.Afterwards the miners strike happened and she destroyed her enemies, an industry, and millions of lives.
Hating her after that isn’t hypocritical or being an asshole, that’s responding to events. And that’s why many will celebrate.
*****************
Anyway, back to the main point of this thread — can Santorum & Romney each avoid putting their foot in theirmouth for 4 more days? It seems hard for them.… -
#59 written by dawolf 1 year ago
@Max
last comment on this — when Bin Laden was killed, would someone celebrating his death, or criticising him after his death, be considered an asshole?
and I am not comparing Thatcher, or this guy I’ve never heard of to Bin Laden btw — just that if your answer to the above is no, then we are just at different points on a sliding scale. If your answer is yes, then I must disagree with you. -
#60 written by Mainer 1 year ago
Shiloh, I’m sure there were some bad muckrakers I just can’t think of any at this moment. There was a wonderful interview on PBS (at least I think it was PBS and with Moyers) where Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein were asked if they thought of themselves as modern day muckrakers in the mold of people such as Sinclair and some others I don’t remember now. I think Bernstein just shook his head no and Woodward commented that while they might like to think that at some level the truth was that the people that Moyers had listed were giant killers and forever far out of their league. I probably have this some what screwed up but I’m sure you get the gist of it.
Dawolf I think the answer to that is N O. I wouldn’t give them 4 hours let alone 4 days. I’m just waiting for some one to pin either one of them down about support for the Blount Amendment or maybe education, or how we should turn over our foreign affairs to Israel, or maybe the list is just too long. Any way I doubt the question should be will they but how bad will they. -
#61 written by Mainer 1 year ago
Here is an even more interesting question dawolf etal. What now happens to the case that Ms. Sherrod has against Brietbart that is as we speak wending its way through the court system? Does the case just die along with Mr. Brietbart or continue on against his estate and or others that may have been involved? I believe Mr. Brietbart was admonished less than a week ago by a judge that is involved for failure to meet some filings. From other web sites there is or was the perception that Mr. Brietbart was going to go down hard for some aspect of the Sherrod case one has to wonder if he was feeling the pressure.
-
#62 written by dawolf 1 year ago
-
#63 written by Mainer 1 year ago
-
#65 written by Max aka Birdpilot 1 year ago
da,
Not being snide, but did you read my entire comment #51? Particularly ¶ 2, beginning: “Several reasons”? Just because I left UBL out of the statement, don’t think I don’t lump him in with those I did. Note my differentiation between political and ideological opponents in a democracy, and heinous criminals who have murdered, tortured and imprisoned innocents. There is a gulf there. I celebrated the death of UBL and find no conflict in that position based on what I just wrote! Had I been alive in 1945, I would have celebrated the death of Hitler. We are not talking orders of magnitude here,different points on the same scale, but a completely different paradigm.
Whilst on the subject, how many British PM’s served more consecutive years in the position? How many elections as party leader, thus PM, did she win? How many other PM’s were elected with the same or more election wins? Was the rest of the British electorate smarter or more stupid than those you say will celebrate? Or just different? I was certainly NOT a Thatcher fan, but the facts are the facts. The greater number of British subjects favoured her over others for over a decade.
And do you agree or disagree concerning hypocrisy in my case, with my heritage, as outlined? What is the difference there? -
#66 written by Max aka Birdpilot 1 year ago
-
You must be logged in to post a comment. - Comment Feed for this Post
About Monotreme (241 posts)
Monotreme is an unabashed liberal and dog lover who lives in an almost-square state in the Western U.S. He keeps a second blog related to his work as a scientist and author at 7synapses.com.







Breitbart has died. OMG! The guy was only 43.
He leaves behind his wife, Susanna, daughter of Orson Bean, and four children.