Comments on: Reelection Watch: August 25, 2012 http://www.logarchism.com/2012/08/25/reelection-watch-august-25-2012/ Governing through Reason Wed, 15 May 2013 20:39:34 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v= By: WA7th http://www.logarchism.com/2012/08/25/reelection-watch-august-25-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-37255 WA7th Sun, 26 Aug 2012 14:51:08 +0000 http://www.logarchism.com/?p=17492#comment-37255 #29 rg — What am I missing here?

You’re missing nothing.  Poor choice of extra word on my part.

]]>
By: Max http://www.logarchism.com/2012/08/25/reelection-watch-august-25-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-37250 Max Sun, 26 Aug 2012 14:12:42 +0000 http://www.logarchism.com/?p=17492#comment-37250 rg,

“ What am I miss­ing here?

THAT one is too loaded for even ME to touch!

]]>
By: rgbact http://www.logarchism.com/2012/08/25/reelection-watch-august-25-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-37248 rgbact Sun, 26 Aug 2012 13:28:02 +0000 http://www.logarchism.com/?p=17492#comment-37248

“Read the rest of it. Mostly it’s more con­cern trolling like this:”

How is that “concern trolling”? Seems a like a real concern. Obama desperately needs to turn out the non-voter. They voted in 2008. Most every poll I’ve seen with him winning is based on a significant Democrat turnout advantage. Nate notes this in the likely voter model disparity. What am I missing here?

]]>
By: dcpetterson http://www.logarchism.com/2012/08/25/reelection-watch-august-25-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-37234 dcpetterson Sun, 26 Aug 2012 05:54:09 +0000 http://www.logarchism.com/?p=17492#comment-37234

They are hav­ing to retire older satel­lites, but fund­ing for replace­ments is iffy.

And when the older models stop working, and there are no replacements, Republicans will loudly and proudly proclaim, “You see??!?! Gubmint doesn’t work!”

]]>
By: Rose http://www.logarchism.com/2012/08/25/reelection-watch-august-25-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-37232 Rose Sun, 26 Aug 2012 05:12:56 +0000 http://www.logarchism.com/?p=17492#comment-37232 And just how do the Republicans know that a hurricane’s path will likely drench Tampa?  Because of weather satellites, up there because of federal government funding, that’s how.  I was speaking to a NOAA meterologist earlier this week.  They are having to retire older satellites, but funding for replacements is iffy.

Those living in hurricane alley have come to depend on these computer models, which are amazingly accurate. 

]]>
By: channelclemente http://www.logarchism.com/2012/08/25/reelection-watch-august-25-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-37214 channelclemente Sun, 26 Aug 2012 01:37:35 +0000 http://www.logarchism.com/?p=17492#comment-37214 An interesting lesson in the role of gender in political coalition building drawing on 2008 and the Clinton/Obama rapprochement.  This is what Romney has to attempt, but in a male dominated party, may be unable to accomplish.  There is a cruel irony in that fact, if true, given his parties approach to gender politics.

http://www.pnas.org/content/106/15/6187.full.pdf+html?sid=3188bb49-31d5-491d-9d41-8ecb1092d05e 

]]>
By: WA7th http://www.logarchism.com/2012/08/25/reelection-watch-august-25-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-37213 WA7th Sun, 26 Aug 2012 01:37:13 +0000 http://www.logarchism.com/?p=17492#comment-37213 cc: The fan and the fer­til­izer are in con­junc­tion for Mr. Rom­ney.  I
would sug­gest he can the birther jokes, 538 has phoned home.  9 points
for Mr. Obama among likely vot­ers.
http://
​fivethir​tyeight​.blogs​.nytimes​.com/​2​0​1​2​/​0​8​/​2​5​/​a​u​g​-​2​
5​-​a​n​-​a​b​o​v​e​-​a​v​e​r​a​g​e​-​l​i​k​e​l​y​-​v​o​t​e​r​-​g​a​p​-​
f​o​r​-​r​o​m​n​ey/

Read the rest of it. Mostly it’s more concern trolling like this:

Non-voters prefer Obama
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0812/79758.html

]]>
By: channelclemente http://www.logarchism.com/2012/08/25/reelection-watch-august-25-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-37208 channelclemente Sat, 25 Aug 2012 23:36:08 +0000 http://www.logarchism.com/?p=17492#comment-37208 The fan and the fertilizer are in conjunction for Mr. Romney.  I would suggest he can the birther jokes, 538 has phoned home.  9 points for Mr. Obama among likely voters.
http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/08/25/aug-25-an-above-average-likely-voter-gap-for-romney/ 

]]>
By: WA7th http://www.logarchism.com/2012/08/25/reelection-watch-august-25-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-37205 WA7th Sat, 25 Aug 2012 23:15:30 +0000 http://www.logarchism.com/?p=17492#comment-37205 Day one of RNC is cancelled.  I wouldn’t be surprised if Romney gets a polling bump for that.

Max — And I have it on first-​​hand knowl­edge the witches breasts are no colder than any other female’s!

Data and methodology, please.  Did you measure two separately at the same time?

]]>
By: Michael Weiss http://www.logarchism.com/2012/08/25/reelection-watch-august-25-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-37195 Michael Weiss Sat, 25 Aug 2012 21:55:22 +0000 http://www.logarchism.com/?p=17492#comment-37195 With the new Post-Dispatch poll in Missouri, I feel more confident that SurveyUSA and Rasmussen, who both have been noisy this season, are the outliers. Today’s Philadelphia Inquirer poll is in line with the trend.

]]>