Comments on: Reelection Watch: September 8, 2012 http://www.logarchism.com/2012/09/08/reelection-watch-september-8-2012/ Governing through Reason Tue, 14 May 2013 23:00:23 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v= By: Logarchism » Reëlection Watch: September 22, 2012 http://www.logarchism.com/2012/09/08/reelection-watch-september-8-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-41526 Logarchism » Reëlection Watch: September 22, 2012 Mon, 24 Sep 2012 10:02:47 +0000 http://www.logarchism.com/?p=18332#comment-41526 […] Reëlec­tion Watch: Sep­tem­ber 8, 2012 (log​a​rchism​.com) Share this article: Barack Obama Mitt Romney […]

]]>
By: dawolf http://www.logarchism.com/2012/09/08/reelection-watch-september-8-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-40238 dawolf Wed, 12 Sep 2012 11:01:20 +0000 http://www.logarchism.com/?p=18332#comment-40238 @DrFunguy

Great article. Extremely well written.

]]>
By: Monotreme http://www.logarchism.com/2012/09/08/reelection-watch-september-8-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-40231 Monotreme Wed, 12 Sep 2012 02:36:44 +0000 http://www.logarchism.com/?p=18332#comment-40231 Beautiful article, Doc.

“It’s the same f**king bill.”
]]>
By: DrFunguy http://www.logarchism.com/2012/09/08/reelection-watch-september-8-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-40230 DrFunguy Wed, 12 Sep 2012 02:07:32 +0000 http://www.logarchism.com/?p=18332#comment-40230 Quote of the day, from the inimitable Pierce, National Treasure:

“Mitt Romney has been elected to only one office in his lifetime. In that one office, he has one significant achievement. And to be nominated by his party, he has had to strangle rhetorically his darling.“
Read more: http://www.esquire.com/features/life-under-romneycare-1012#ixzz26DWAVvCc

]]>
By: rgbact http://www.logarchism.com/2012/09/08/reelection-watch-september-8-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-40186 rgbact Tue, 11 Sep 2012 18:27:39 +0000 http://www.logarchism.com/?p=18332#comment-40186 Interesting chart on Gallup that measures convention bounces. Obama’s bounce wasn’t that big, its just that Romney’s is the only negative bounce besides John Kerry, so the net change was a tad bigger than recent history. The bigger bounce isn’t very correlated to the eventual winner though.

]]>
By: turrboenvy http://www.logarchism.com/2012/09/08/reelection-watch-september-8-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-40175 turrboenvy Tue, 11 Sep 2012 14:11:46 +0000 http://www.logarchism.com/?p=18332#comment-40175 Voting should be as easy as picking a cup when you get your morning coffee. It would immensely increase turnout. Every voter gets a free card, every convenience store has a machine (like the lotto machine). Swipe the card, place your vote, buy a coffee and off you go. Security is obviously an issue, but the lotto seems to manage.

We could use fingerprint identification. We don’t even need to validate that the person is who they say they are — you only have one thumb print so you can only vote once. Your thumbprint goes in the system the first time you vote.

Anyway, the shocking thing at 7-election is that Vermont, of all places, is tied.

As an aside, I’ve got 2 problems in commenting. I’m using Chrome 21.
1) I have no reply button that I can find.
2) My linebreaks get screwed up (I hit enter once or twice) so I have to hit edit and edit the HTML manually.

]]>
By: Michael Weiss http://www.logarchism.com/2012/09/08/reelection-watch-september-8-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-40165 Michael Weiss Tue, 11 Sep 2012 05:06:10 +0000 http://www.logarchism.com/?p=18332#comment-40165 WA7th,
I’d far prefer a mudslide.

Yum.

]]>
By: WA7th http://www.logarchism.com/2012/09/08/reelection-watch-september-8-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-40164 WA7th Tue, 11 Sep 2012 03:18:51 +0000 http://www.logarchism.com/?p=18332#comment-40164 The 7-Election is looking like a landslide.

]]>
By: Max http://www.logarchism.com/2012/09/08/reelection-watch-september-8-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-40156 Max Tue, 11 Sep 2012 00:06:11 +0000 http://www.logarchism.com/?p=18332#comment-40156 da, No, I’m assuming that SOME are partisan bettors who will let their ideology write a check that their bank will have to cover!

]]>
By: dawolf http://www.logarchism.com/2012/09/08/reelection-watch-september-8-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-40153 dawolf Mon, 10 Sep 2012 23:23:40 +0000 http://www.logarchism.com/?p=18332#comment-40153 Max — you’re assuming that people are partisan bettors. Some are. The best gamblers aren’t.

]]>