<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reelection Watch: September 29, 2012</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.logarchism.com/2012/09/29/reelection-watch-september-29-2012/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.logarchism.com/2012/09/29/reelection-watch-september-29-2012/</link>
	<description>Governing through Reason</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 04:43:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.superfeedr.com"/>	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Weiss</title>
		<link>http://www.logarchism.com/2012/09/29/reelection-watch-september-29-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-42176</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Weiss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2012 02:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logarchism.com/?p=19844#comment-42176</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Seems like neither attack is particularly meaningful, given how many substantive issues divide the two candidates.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems like neither attack is particularly meaningful, given how many substantive issues divide the two candidates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rose</title>
		<link>http://www.logarchism.com/2012/09/29/reelection-watch-september-29-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-42172</link>
		<dc:creator>Rose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2012 02:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logarchism.com/?p=19844#comment-42172</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s expected that Romney will attack Obama for &quot;speaking Black&quot; when addressing a group of African-Americans.  The Romney YouTube clip from Jackson, MS is surfacing everywhere.  &quot;Mornin y&#039;all!  I started the day with some biscuits and cheesy grits.&quot;  No one in the South says &quot;cheesy grits&quot;, it&#039;s &quot;cheese grits&quot;.

Even &quot;Dogs Against Romney&quot; is showing it.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It’s expected that Romney will attack Obama for “speaking Black” when addressing a group of African-Americans.  The Romney YouTube clip from Jackson, MS is surfacing everywhere.  “Mornin y’all!  I started the day with some biscuits and cheesy grits.”  No one in the South says “cheesy grits”, it’s “cheese grits”.</p>
<p>Even “Dogs Against Romney” is showing it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mclever</title>
		<link>http://www.logarchism.com/2012/09/29/reelection-watch-september-29-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-42026</link>
		<dc:creator>mclever</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2012 01:55:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logarchism.com/?p=19844#comment-42026</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Rose&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don&#039;t think the Electoral College will be going anywhere for one main reason--nationwide recounts every time the election is within a million votes. Expensive, annoying, frustrating, and time-consuming. Can you imagine the hanging chads of Broward Co. being played out in every single precinct in every single state??&#160; The electoral college confines the recounts to only the states that are close. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I know that some people don&#039;t like it, and there may be some good reform options out there, but I think that doing away with the Electoral College would have some nasty unintended consequences.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Rose</p>
<p>I don’t think the Electoral College will be going anywhere for one main reason–nationwide recounts every time the election is within a million votes. Expensive, annoying, frustrating, and time-consuming. Can you imagine the hanging chads of Broward Co. being played out in every single precinct in every single state??  The electoral college confines the recounts to only the states that are close. </p>
<p>I know that some people don’t like it, and there may be some good reform options out there, but I think that doing away with the Electoral College would have some nasty unintended consequences.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PNE</title>
		<link>http://www.logarchism.com/2012/09/29/reelection-watch-september-29-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-42015</link>
		<dc:creator>PNE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2012 21:49:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logarchism.com/?p=19844#comment-42015</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mainer, you said:&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;Dill is already toast and needs to get out of King’s way before we have Libby Mitchell part two.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I agree completely, and I have been trying to explain this to my friends. I tell them that a vote for Dill would be basically a vote for Summers, and that this splitting of the liberal vote is how we got LePage. I think some people are convinced by this, but I have one friend who is particularly far left (he&#039;s voting for Jill Stein) and he&#039;s not into the strategic voting the way I am, so he says he&#039;ll vote for Dill. If the race tightens any more, then I&#039;ll really try to get him to vote for King.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;However, I still think that King will win, and probably by at least 10 points. I was recently on a drive from Central Maine to the coast, and on the way I saw several Angus King signs and only a few Summers signs (luckily, no Dill signs).&#160;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mainer, you said:
</p>
<p>“Dill is already toast and needs to get out of King’s way before we have Libby Mitchell part two.”</p>
<p>I agree completely, and I have been trying to explain this to my friends. I tell them that a vote for Dill would be basically a vote for Summers, and that this splitting of the liberal vote is how we got LePage. I think some people are convinced by this, but I have one friend who is particularly far left (he’s voting for Jill Stein) and he’s not into the strategic voting the way I am, so he says he’ll vote for Dill. If the race tightens any more, then I’ll really try to get him to vote for King.</p>
<p>However, I still think that King will win, and probably by at least 10 points. I was recently on a drive from Central Maine to the coast, and on the way I saw several Angus King signs and only a few Summers signs (luckily, no Dill signs). </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mainer</title>
		<link>http://www.logarchism.com/2012/09/29/reelection-watch-september-29-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-41997</link>
		<dc:creator>Mainer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2012 16:05:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logarchism.com/?p=19844#comment-41997</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;P&gt;PNE, I had missed that you too are in Maine, no wonder that I find your posts to be so clear. Yes the effort to have a massive GOTV in NH for the Dems is already underway. I mentioned having a Republican couple I know being down there Last week and they were no impressed with what they were seeing. One comment may sort of sum it up. Having the bulk of the Republican GOTV involving pastors telling their flock how to vote and that they had better vote is quite probably not going to bring in enough voters to do the job. Another was that ome elements of the teaper movement there seemed more interested in pissing off moderates than any thing else. While there are some pretty strong teaper areas there there are also areas that are not and those areas contain the bulk of the population and the colleges. I suspect a similar thing to happen here in Maine and that it will work except in one instance. Dill is already toast and needs to get out of King&#039;s way before we have Libby Mitchell part two. I for one will never forgive her for setting up the stage for LePage.&lt;/P&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PNE, I had missed that you too are in Maine, no wonder that I find your posts to be so clear. Yes the effort to have a massive GOTV in NH for the Dems is already underway. I mentioned having a Republican couple I know being down there Last week and they were no impressed with what they were seeing. One comment may sort of sum it up. Having the bulk of the Republican GOTV involving pastors telling their flock how to vote and that they had better vote is quite probably not going to bring in enough voters to do the job. Another was that ome elements of the teaper movement there seemed more interested in pissing off moderates than any thing else. While there are some pretty strong teaper areas there there are also areas that are not and those areas contain the bulk of the population and the colleges. I suspect a similar thing to happen here in Maine and that it will work except in one instance. Dill is already toast and needs to get out of King’s way before we have Libby Mitchell part two. I for one will never forgive her for setting up the stage for LePage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Rich</title>
		<link>http://www.logarchism.com/2012/09/29/reelection-watch-september-29-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-41995</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Rich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2012 14:04:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logarchism.com/?p=19844#comment-41995</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No idea. It does have a catchy beat though.&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No idea. It does have a catchy beat though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Monotreme</title>
		<link>http://www.logarchism.com/2012/09/29/reelection-watch-september-29-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-41993</link>
		<dc:creator>Monotreme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2012 13:34:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logarchism.com/?p=19844#comment-41993</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Chris,&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;The other Mitt Romneys are just &lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;WHAT?!?!&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/div&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris,
</p>
<div>The other Mitt Romneys are just <b><i>WHAT?!?!</i></b></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Rich</title>
		<link>http://www.logarchism.com/2012/09/29/reelection-watch-september-29-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-41991</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Rich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2012 13:30:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logarchism.com/?p=19844#comment-41991</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Please stand up.&#160;&lt;br&gt;http://youtu.be/bxch-yi14BE&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please stand up. <br /><a href="http://youtu.be/bxch-yi14BE" rel="nofollow">http://youtu.be/bxch-yi14BE</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max</title>
		<link>http://www.logarchism.com/2012/09/29/reelection-watch-september-29-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-41987</link>
		<dc:creator>Max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2012 12:21:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logarchism.com/?p=19844#comment-41987</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ironic, isn&#039;t it, that in spite of the provisions of the Electoral College, the two states with the largest number of EV each are considered uncontested.&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ironic, isn’t it, that in spite of the provisions of the Electoral College, the two states with the largest number of EV each are considered uncontested.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rose</title>
		<link>http://www.logarchism.com/2012/09/29/reelection-watch-september-29-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-41985</link>
		<dc:creator>Rose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2012 06:23:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logarchism.com/?p=19844#comment-41985</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What do you all think about the chances of ever getting rid of the Electoral College? &#160;All the attention paid to swing states has got to make most of the electorate feel that their votes don&#039;t mean much. &#160;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;Having lived in the two reddest states, I &lt;i&gt;know&lt;/i&gt; my presidential vote doesn&#039;t mean diddly squat.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do you all think about the chances of ever getting rid of the Electoral College?  All the attention paid to swing states has got to make most of the electorate feel that their votes don’t mean much.  
</p>
<p>Having lived in the two reddest states, I <i>know</i> my presidential vote doesn’t mean diddly squat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk
Object Caching 884/909 objects using disk

 Served from: www.logarchism.com @ 2013-06-20 00:23:14 by W3 Total Cache -->