You’re last post is a bunch of partisan feces throwing. I understand you’re upset—as Obama has been exposed for the nation without his teleprompter. I’ll check back when you’ve cooled off.

It was truly unbelievable to watch. Romney was trying to be more like Obama. That made sense to me, seeing as Obama is (or was) ahead in the race. The unbelievable thing was that Obama was trying to be more like Romney. Why?

I agree that Obama doesn’t need to counter every attack. But, he needs to counter some of them, then make a few attacks of his own. Its called debating. Rope a dope and playing prevent defense is not going to work. Unanswered attacks will lead to defeat. Just ask John Kerry.

I hope you are right and I am wrong. If you are right, and Obama played it correctly, the polls should continue to keep trending up for Obama. We will see in a few days.

He has made it plain he’s going to slash taxes for the incredibly wealthy, cut services to everyone else, raise your taxes, remove whatever constraints there are on predatory businesses, throw away your health care and your retirement — and he has hoodwinked you into thinking there is something fiscally prudent, even noble, in doing so. Plus, he hasn’t the first clue about foreign policy or how to handle the military. And his Veep is an idiot. And he dresses funny.

You’ve got a clown conman for a presidential candidate. You don’t have the first clue what he stands for.

IOW, rgbact hasn’t a clue, so he defends the indefensible without actually pointing to a SINGLE FACT.

Well, maybe one: “Romney’s broad outlines are right on target.“
“broad outlines“
“on target”

Read: “A lack of specificity hits the bulleye.”

No, I didn’t think so, either.

He wants to repeal all of it.
So, insurance companies can reject you if you have a pre-existing condition, and kids can’t stay on their parents’ insurance, right? Though Romney said h wouldn’t change that What els is he lying about? And which regulations in Dodd-Frank will Romney keep? I notice you declined to say what Romney will replace these things with. Try again.

I imagine Obama didn’t mention he’d be slashing Medicare and raising taxes when he was campaigning for healthcare in 2008 either
Well, since he didn’t do these things, it scarcely matters. But the question here isn’t tu quoque. It is, What is Romney actually saying he’s going to do? Do you actually know?

I ask again — under what circumstances will Romney allow abortions to remain legal? Do you know his position on this? Yes or no.

imagine the mortgage deduction will be curtailed though, since that was
part of S-B, and Romney has talked about favoring their approach
Of course, Ryan voted against Simpson-Bowles. Do you support or oppose Ryan? Is Romney admitting and running on repeal of the mortgage deduction? How will that counteract reducing the top marginal rate from 35% to 25%?

You again avoided answering which federal programs Romney will end, and how much it will save. Try again.

He wants to repeal all of it. Does Obama.never offer some agreement on GOP ideas and is Romney not allowed or he’s a Lie–lie–liar!!!

I’m pretty sure Romney won’t be focused on abortion. I just said, all that’ll be gone is a federal guarantee. New York can still abort to its heart’s content.We’ve had plenty of Republican presidents and not much has changed on abortion.

I imagine Obama didn’t mention he’d be slashing Medicare and raising taxes when he was campaigning for healthcare in 2008 either. Those kind of details often are left till later. I imagine the mortgage deduction will be curtailed though, since that was part of S-B, and Romney has talked about favoring their approach

No, Obama had massive majorities for 2 years. If a GOP prez had total control for 2 years and still was harping about PBS getting subsidies.….I’d laugh in his face.