<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reelection Watch: October 27, 2012</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.logarchism.com/2012/10/27/reelection-watch-october-27-2012/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.logarchism.com/2012/10/27/reelection-watch-october-27-2012/</link>
	<description>Governing through Reason</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 06:31:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.superfeedr.com"/>	<item>
		<title>By: DrFunguy</title>
		<link>http://www.logarchism.com/2012/10/27/reelection-watch-october-27-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-45520</link>
		<dc:creator>DrFunguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2012 15:20:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logarchism.com/?p=21118#comment-45520</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Quote of the day:&#160;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&quot;...despite the participation of tens of thousands of journalists spending tens of millions of dollars using a dizzying array of communications technology devoted to covering the campaign, the system ultimately fails to justify itself in its most essential purpose: to ensure accountability for citizens and their leaders and to offer the kind of information necessary to help voters make an educated choice for the future of their country...&quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thenation.com/article/170790/mainstream-medias-trivial-pursuit-campaign-2012&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Eric Alterman&lt;/a&gt;Amen]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quote of the day: 
</p>
<p>“…despite the participation of tens of thousands of journalists spending tens of millions of dollars using a dizzying array of communications technology devoted to covering the campaign, the system ultimately fails to justify itself in its most essential purpose: to ensure accountability for citizens and their leaders and to offer the kind of information necessary to help voters make an educated choice for the future of their country…“<a href="http://www.thenation.com/article/170790/mainstream-medias-trivial-pursuit-campaign-2012" rel="nofollow">Eric Alterman</a>Amen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Weiss</title>
		<link>http://www.logarchism.com/2012/10/27/reelection-watch-october-27-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-45453</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Weiss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2012 16:18:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logarchism.com/?p=21118#comment-45453</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[rgbact,
&lt;blockquote&gt;I thought you said fraud is insignif­i­cant before?&lt;/blockquote&gt;
It&#039;s really unfortunate how little attention you&#039;ve paid to this subject over the past year. I&#039;ve been the one mostly leading the charge at &lt;i&gt;Logarchism&lt;/i&gt; regarding the voting process itself. Over that time, my message (and DC&#039;s as well, if you had been paying attention) is as follows:

- The security of our voting system is a huge issue
- The most significant vulnerabilities in our current system revolve around the decentralized nature of the collecting, counting, and reporting functions, all of which have insufficient (and in many cases, &lt;i&gt;no&lt;/i&gt;) checks on them
- The focus on in-person spoofing votes (i.e., voter impersonation) is a distraction, aimed at a low-value, high risk form of attack least likely to be used in a statistically significant way

The referenced article demostrates exactly how and why this is the case.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rgbact,</p>
<blockquote><p>I thought you said fraud is insignif­i­cant before?</p></blockquote>
<p>It’s really unfortunate how little attention you’ve paid to this subject over the past year. I’ve been the one mostly leading the charge at <i>Logarchism</i> regarding the voting process itself. Over that time, my message (and DC’s as well, if you had been paying attention) is as follows:</p>
<p>- The security of our voting system is a huge issue<br />
– The most significant vulnerabilities in our current system revolve around the decentralized nature of the collecting, counting, and reporting functions, all of which have insufficient (and in many cases, <i>no</i>) checks on them<br />
– The focus on in-person spoofing votes (i.e., voter impersonation) is a distraction, aimed at a low-value, high risk form of attack least likely to be used in a statistically significant way</p>
<p>The referenced article demostrates exactly how and why this is the case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Weiss</title>
		<link>http://www.logarchism.com/2012/10/27/reelection-watch-october-27-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-45450</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Weiss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2012 16:12:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logarchism.com/?p=21118#comment-45450</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An interesting interview on &lt;i&gt;Meet the Press&lt;/i&gt; today with Governor Kasich of Ohio. Kasich expressed a great deal of confidence that Romney would carry Ohio. Now, granted, this could be nothing more than partisan cheerleading, but given the degree to which the Ohio government (like all states) has the power to falsify election results, and is able to get away with it as long as the election appeared close to begin with...it&#039;s really irresponsible for him to make such a statement.

Moreover, it begs the bigger question that we should be asking: does he know more than he&#039;s letting on? Is the Ohio election, just over a week away, fixed?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An interesting interview on <i>Meet the Press</i> today with Governor Kasich of Ohio. Kasich expressed a great deal of confidence that Romney would carry Ohio. Now, granted, this could be nothing more than partisan cheerleading, but given the degree to which the Ohio government (like all states) has the power to falsify election results, and is able to get away with it as long as the election appeared close to begin with…it’s really irresponsible for him to make such a statement.</p>
<p>Moreover, it begs the bigger question that we should be asking: does he know more than he’s letting on? Is the Ohio election, just over a week away, fixed?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DrFunguy</title>
		<link>http://www.logarchism.com/2012/10/27/reelection-watch-october-27-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-45449</link>
		<dc:creator>DrFunguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2012 15:46:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logarchism.com/?p=21118#comment-45449</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[rgb&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;dc may not have provided it this time but there have been numerous discussions here documenting the progressive &lt;i&gt;values&lt;/i&gt;&#160;of Americans (e.g. support for gun control, gay rights, universal healthcare, higher taxes for the 1%) as opposed to label identification.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rgb
</p>
<p>dc may not have provided it this time but there have been numerous discussions here documenting the progressive <i>values</i> of Americans (e.g. support for gun control, gay rights, universal healthcare, higher taxes for the 1%) as opposed to label identification.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rgbact</title>
		<link>http://www.logarchism.com/2012/10/27/reelection-watch-october-27-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-45439</link>
		<dc:creator>rgbact</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2012 11:43:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logarchism.com/?p=21118#comment-45439</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;br&gt;&lt;i&gt;This idea can only be main­tained because elec­tion fraud is ram­pant in this coun­try.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Wait, I thought you said fraud is insignificant before? Are you now admitting that there are many ways to scam the system? Btw, have you caught the recent work by James OKeefe, which lost a Democrat&#039;s son his campaign job? &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;i&gt;In the end, the meme that we are a “center-​​right” nation is false.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I agree that the &quot;center-right nation&quot; is likely false. Course, your provide little evidence to support your &quot;progressive nation&quot; so I guess you&#039;re trying to start your own meme.&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>This idea can only be main­tained because elec­tion fraud is ram­pant in this coun­try.</i></p>
<p>Wait, I thought you said fraud is insignificant before? Are you now admitting that there are many ways to scam the system? Btw, have you caught the recent work by James OKeefe, which lost a Democrat’s son his campaign job? </p>
<p><i>In the end, the meme that we are a “center-​​right” nation is false.</i></p>
<p>I agree that the “center-right nation” is likely false. Course, your provide little evidence to support your “progressive nation” so I guess you’re trying to start your own meme.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dcpetterson</title>
		<link>http://www.logarchism.com/2012/10/27/reelection-watch-october-27-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-45436</link>
		<dc:creator>dcpetterson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2012 07:50:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logarchism.com/?p=21118#comment-45436</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the end, the meme that we are a &quot;center-right&quot; nation (by which they really mean &quot;way the hell crazy-ass far-right insane&quot; nation) is false. This idea can only be maintained because election fraud is rampant in this country. We are a progressive nation, and when progressives are elected, it is because the overwhelming weight of Truth sometimes overcomes the forces of despair.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the end, the meme that we are a “center-right” nation (by which they really mean “way the hell crazy-ass far-right insane” nation) is false. This idea can only be maintained because election fraud is rampant in this country. We are a progressive nation, and when progressives are elected, it is because the overwhelming weight of Truth sometimes overcomes the forces of despair.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Weiss</title>
		<link>http://www.logarchism.com/2012/10/27/reelection-watch-october-27-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-45435</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Weiss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2012 05:47:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logarchism.com/?p=21118#comment-45435</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[MoldyMe,
&lt;blockquote&gt;If this is true, how can this sys­temic fraud be com­bated in the next 10 days?&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Simply put, it can&#039;t. This, by the way, is part of why I believe Florida is hopeless for Obama.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MoldyMe,</p>
<blockquote><p>If this is true, how can this sys­temic fraud be com­bated in the next 10 days?</p></blockquote>
<p>Simply put, it can’t. This, by the way, is part of why I believe Florida is hopeless for Obama.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Weiss</title>
		<link>http://www.logarchism.com/2012/10/27/reelection-watch-october-27-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-45434</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Weiss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2012 05:46:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logarchism.com/?p=21118#comment-45434</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DC,
Not smoking gun, but pretty compelling. It&#039;s not a surprise to me, though. As I&#039;ve mentioned before, this is a problem that long predates computers. We talk big about having the best of everything (don&#039;t we, GROG?), but our election system is worse than that of many nations we typically consider despotic. And this isn&#039;t a problem that can be solved by voter ID laws.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DC,<br />
Not smoking gun, but pretty compelling. It’s not a surprise to me, though. As I’ve mentioned before, this is a problem that long predates computers. We talk big about having the best of everything (don’t we, GROG?), but our election system is worse than that of many nations we typically consider despotic. And this isn’t a problem that can be solved by voter ID laws.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: channelclemente</title>
		<link>http://www.logarchism.com/2012/10/27/reelection-watch-october-27-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-45431</link>
		<dc:creator>channelclemente</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2012 02:32:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logarchism.com/?p=21118#comment-45431</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mono,&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;the cums are smooth and monotonic. &#160;I recognize it could be an extraneous effect, all I&#039;m saying is something is out of the ordinary. &#160;This is how they caught the &#039;round off&#039; bank bandit years ago. You remember the guy who cracked the bank software, and was taking the penny round off error to his account. &#160;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mono,
</p>
<p>the cums are smooth and monotonic.  I recognize it could be an extraneous effect, all I’m saying is something is out of the ordinary.  This is how they caught the ’round off’ bank bandit years ago. You remember the guy who cracked the bank software, and was taking the penny round off error to his account.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Monotreme</title>
		<link>http://www.logarchism.com/2012/10/27/reelection-watch-october-27-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-45430</link>
		<dc:creator>Monotreme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2012 02:12:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logarchism.com/?p=21118#comment-45430</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[cc,&lt;div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;It&#039;s not the analysis I&#039;m questioning, it&#039;s the basic assumptions.&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;What if (for example) larger precincts are demographically more likely to go for Romney than Santorum?&lt;/div&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cc,
<div></div>
<div>It’s not the analysis I’m questioning, it’s the basic assumptions.
</p>
</div>
<div>What if (for example) larger precincts are demographically more likely to go for Romney than Santorum?</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk
Object Caching 885/900 objects using disk

 Served from: www.logarchism.com @ 2013-06-19 10:32:08 by W3 Total Cache -->