Posts tagged First Amendment to the United States Constitution

Broken Links

32

Icon-religionTwo weeks ago, I wrote an arti­cle on evi­dence for humanity’s old­est forms of reli­gion. In my view, many aspects of issues we face today can be illu­mi­nated by think­ing about their his­tory, and much of that his­tory is reli­gious in nature. That arti­cle didn’t gen­er­ate many com­ments, but those it did con­vinced me this is a topic many of our read­ers would like to think more about. This, then, is the sec­ond in what might become a con­tin­u­ing series on Old Time Religion.

The sep­a­ra­tion of Church and State is one of America’s most cher­ished free­doms. The right to wor­ship as we choose — or to not wor­ship at all — with­out the impo­si­tion of an offi­cial national reli­gion is the very first right listed in the Bill of Rights: “Con­gress shall make no law respect­ing an estab­lish­ment of religion…”

Yet, in an appar­ent con­tra­dic­tion, reli­gion has never been absent from our pol­i­tics or our pub­lic dis­course, and attempts to ban­ish it com­pletely have always failed. We want to wor­ship as we choose; we do not want reli­gion to be imposed; yet we want our elected offi­cials to be reli­gious, and many of our most impor­tant his­tor­i­cal con­tro­ver­sies (abo­li­tion, pro­hi­bi­tion, civil rights, sup­port of or oppo­si­tion to var­i­ous wars, and so on) have often been couched in reli­gious terms.

The rela­tion­ship between faith and soci­ety is com­plex, par­tic­u­larly in west­ern cul­ture. The rea­sons for this com­plex­ity lie rooted in Euro­pean his­tory over the last two mil­len­nia. Exam­in­ing a part of that his­tory can help us under­stand why it is so hard to ban­ish reli­gious ideas and reli­gious moti­va­tions from our pol­i­tics and our gov­ern­ment. It may indeed be impos­si­ble to do so. We may not want to do it even if we could. (more…)

Supreme Court Watch: Reichle et al. v. Howards

4

It’s like some­thing out of a Hitch­cock movie.

Today, the Supreme Court hears argu­ments in a case which pits Secret Ser­vice agents (Vir­gil D. “Gus” Reichle, Dan Doyle, and col­leagues) against Steven Howards, a res­i­dent of Golden, Col­orado. The issue is whether Howards can sue the Secret Ser­vice agents for retal­ia­tory arrest, in vio­la­tion of his First Amend­ment right to free speech.

How did Mr. Howards come to be arrested by the Secret Ser­vice? (more…)

Supreme Court Watch: United States v. Alvarez

21

Xavier Alvarez

Does the Con­sti­tu­tion per­mit crim­i­nal­iz­ing liars? Not per­jury, mind you, just lying to some­one in a more casual envi­ron­ment? Or, per­haps, lying while on the cam­paign trail?

That’s the topic being addressed today in the Supreme Court.

In 2007, Xavier Alvarez ran for a seat on the (Clare­mont, Cal­i­for­nia) Three Val­leys Munic­i­pal Water Dis­trict’s board of direc­tors. While cam­paign­ing, he described him­self as a retired Marine who received the Medal of Honor in 1987 for his efforts dur­ing the U.S. Embassy hostage cri­sis in Iran in 1979, dur­ing which he per­son­ally res­cued the U.S. Ambassador.

As you can see from his photo at right, Xavier Alvarez clearly was a highly dec­o­rated soldier.

He told many peo­ple of his sur­vival of three heli­copter crashes and 15 gun­shots dur­ing his mil­i­tary career.

The trou­ble is, all of those state­ments are false. (more…)

Albert Snyder v. Phelps, Westboro Baptist Church et al.

0
Shirley Roper-Phelps, a prominent member of th...

Image via Wikipedia

The Supreme Court has just released its rul­ing, on an 8–1 vote (Jus­tice Alito dis­sent­ing) in Albert Sny­der v. Phelps, West­boro Bap­tist Church et al. The court finds that West­boro Bap­tist Church has a First Amend­ment right to picket mil­i­tary funerals.

Go to Top